Written By : Simon
THE United Nations (UN) released the most significant global report on the physical science of climate change to date on Monday.
About 234 scientists and government representatives from 195 countries comprising the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have told us how the world’s climate responds to human actions.
We have less than 10 years to make radical changes. Here is how it affects Southeast Asia and some measures we can take to manage the risks of global warming even as we face down the pandemic.
The past six years have been the hottest on record. Extreme weather events are occurring with greater frequency: droughts, heatwaves, wildfires, floods, and superstorms.
Monday’s IPCC report reveals that due to climate change Southeast Asia has already experienced hot extremes, less frequent but increased rainfall, fewer but more extreme tropical cyclones, and agricultural and ecological droughts.
For the world, warming has irreversibly set in motion up to half a metre’s sea-level rise by 2100 and 2m to 3m over the next 2,000 years.
Ocean acidification will affect coastal and marine ecosystems and seafood supply. We can expect more compound extreme events, such as simultaneous heatwaves and droughts.
Tipping points, a critical threshold beyond which a climate system reorganises, often abruptly and/or irreversibly, could occur with Amazon deforestation, the Greenland icesheet melting, and the North Atlantic circulation system.
The race is on to limit average global temperature increase by 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. This means “strong, rapid, and sustained reductions” in planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs), especially carbon dioxide, from burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and other human activities.
The goal is to reach net zero emissions as soon as possible to limit warming to 1.5°C. Current warming puts us at 1.1°C. We are likely to hit 1.5°C warming by the early 2030s.
However, existing pledges by governments will only deliver 2.4°C to 2.9°C by 2100. Extreme rainfall intensifies by seven per cent for each additional 1°C.
The IPCC recently indicated that emissions would need to be cut by around 45 per cent by 2030 compared with 2010. Their new report sets out a carbon budget that would give us the best chance of stabilising at 1.5°C warming, but at current emissions we could exhaust this before 2028.
Furthermore, most of this carbon budget would be consumed by richer industrialised nations who have historically occupied most of our atmospheric space.
The global pandemic and climate crisis will be fought based on science and governments putting in place effective policies. We will have to overcome inequitable impacts and access to resources.
Rich countries possess both the technologies and means to support global solutions — think of vaccines and renewable energy. Many poor countries will suffer the worst consequences of both the pandemic and climate change and are ill-equipped to adapt or recover.
Vaccine hoarding amid the pandemic has provided a disappointing lesson in how countries with means will take care of themselves at the expense of others. Global solidarity is needed.
The most prudent course would be to embrace pessimism and optimism, and work towards both alternatives with healthy scepticism towards false solutions.
Optimism means supporting global efforts to reduce emissions both here and in those countries that have historically polluted the atmosphere most. These can be “green new deals” that generate economic opportunities out of a just transition to climate-friendly industries.
However, unless technology and finance flows to developing countries, new green deals will be a policy privilege of developed countries. If poorer nations do not have access to these resources to clean their development pathway, then, just like vaccines, rich nations will not be safe from climate change.
Pessimism involves preparing adaptation measures to protect the most vulnerable at home if climate targets are missed, as well as from irreversible changes set in motion such as sea-level rise. This means building resilience in communities at risk of extreme weather events.
Scepticism means avoiding false solutions, such as efforts by developed countries to pursue “net zero” by buying up carbon sinks in developing countries.
These delay rapid reductions in developed country emissions with schemes that risk fuelling land inequality in poorer countries as richer players buy up tracts of nature and trade emissions.
Popular with large corporations and rich countries, false net zero offers a new way to “pay to pollute” instead of genuinely greening economies.
A 2017 study found that just 100 companies are responsible for 71 per cent of global emissions. There will be no climate solution that does not involve a fundamental transformation of industry.
Getting this decade right will involve a deep green transformation of work, government and society, and equitable sharing of technology, resources, and atmospheric space.
